Who bears the burden of proposed property tax hike? Ordinary homeowners

As long as commercial property owners can game the system, residential homeowners will suffer


Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Amara Enyia


This week it was announced that the City of Chicago would raise property taxes in order to generate $600 million to help pay police and fire pension costs, as well as address its other budgetary needs.

The mayor is touting a list of moves the administration has made to shore up its fiscal health, while stating that the property tax hike is necessary to right the city's fiscal ship.

No doubt, a property tax increase was inevitable due to the years of mismanagement, inefficiency and corruption in government. However, there are some implications of the proposed increase that must be considered before City Council votes on the issue.

Many people will be surprised to learn that residential homeowners are disproportionately bearing the cost of property tax increases. Residential property owners are actually paying an increased share of property taxes while business owners' share has dropped over the last 20 years.

Residential owners pay 62.7 percent of property taxes (an increase from 44 percent in 1981), while businesses pay 37 percent (a drop from 55 percent in 1981). This means the tax burden is shifting to homeowners.

This shift is largely because large businesses and commercial real estate owners are able to hire expensive law firms to submit property tax appeals that undervalue commercial property — essentially granting them significant property tax reductions. It's no coincidence that some of the most notorious political insiders — Ald. Ed Burke (14th) and Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan have lucrative law practices focused on property tax appeals for large business clientele.

The City of Chicago — in spite of its financial bind — does almost nothing to recoup millions upon millions of dollars in potential property tax revenue that is lost because of this practice. This is due, in part, to 2002 legislation pushed by Ald. Burke and supported unanimously in City Council. This legislation barred the city from intervening in property tax appeals of under $1 million.

As long as an appeal is for up to $999,999, the city cannot intervene. There are massive consequences to this legislation. According to a Civic Federation report, from 2000 to 2008, the assessor's office and the Board of Review reduced residential assessments by $4.85 billion and commercial assessments by $32.5 billion — almost seven times more.

The mayor proposed an exemption to the property tax increase that seeks to cushion the shock of an increase and it's based on residents whose homes are valued at $250,0000 and under. However, residential home values are not a good indicator of a homeowners' ability to pay. Wages and salaries have been stagnant for years, so an increase in home values does not predicate an increase in one's ability to pay. Moreover, in gentrifying areas, home value increases may negatively affect homeowners on fixed incomes (such as seniors). A property tax abatement should be based on income level — not home value.

The administration must pursue commercial property and other mechanisms that "game" the system much more aggressively. And it must implement a system that takes into account income level by way of a series of rebates and/or exemptions. If this is not done, this property tax increase — both for this year and in subsequent years — will have a disastrous effect on residents already looking for a reason to leave the city, the region and the state. 

Email: municipalmaven@gmail.com

Reader Comments

4 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Christine Jassak from Chicago  

Posted: September 24th, 2015 3:19 PM

I've lived in my house since I was 2. Dad built it when he returned from the war. Mom is now 97. I am now also on Social Security. WHERE DO THESE PEOPLE THINK WE'RE GOING TO GET THIS MONEY??? WHY DIDN'T THESE CLOWNS SEE WHERE THIS WAS GOING TO PUT US WHEN THEY KEPT PUSHING IT OFF TO GET RE-ELECTED AND YET NO ONE GETS PUNISHED EXCEPT US......

ER from Chicago  

Posted: September 24th, 2015 9:48 AM

I'm one home owner who has had it with property taxes. They assessment process/system is so broken, the possiblity of the increase being pased on fairly is nil. I WILL NOT SUPPORT ANY POLITICIAN WHO INCREASES MY PROPERTY TAX.

DL from Chicago  

Posted: September 23rd, 2015 7:12 PM

Well said, RJ. And speaking from the armpit of Austin, when our neighborhood starts receiving the same level of services and investment as Lincoln Park, I'll be glad to contribute to Chicago's fiscal responsibilities in kind.

RJ from Chicago  

Posted: September 23rd, 2015 5:17 PM

IF there is money to reconfigure / rebuild roads to accommodate bicycles there is no need for property tax increases. Non-government workers have endured job loss, pay cuts and no raises for most of a decade, City of Chicago public employees have been getting raises every year! Time to eliminate general pay increases, step increases, etc. for public employees. Chicago has 2x the aldermanic districts that NYC has with a much smaller population, time to change that!!! Past time!

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2018

To view the full print edition of the Austin Weekly News 2018 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Austin and Garfield Park.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments